Category: Chess

  • The Sixth Ply

    Before we get started let’s define what a ply is in chess:

     A ply is a half move and a move is equivalent to 2 ply or a turn by each player. For example,  1. e4 is one ply and 1…e5 would be the 2nd ply, together these two plys make one move.

    Getting close to the truth of a chess position requires the calculation of a minimum of 6 ply (3 moves). The higher your rating the higher the ply calculation requirement increases since your opponent will be delving more deeply into the position than you. If you calculate anything less than 3 ply you are playing hope chess, since you are not forseeing your opponent’s responses. 

    Below is an assessment of how calculation skill correlates to one’s chess rating:

    0-1000 1 ply

    1000-1200 2-3 ply

    1200-1400 4 ply

    1400-1600 6 ply

    1600-1800 8 ply

    1800-1900 10 ply

    1900-2000 12 ply

    Stopping your calculations too soon can prevent you from finding the winning move. Many times the winning move comes after a series of seemingly unfavorable moves, and stopping your calculation too soon will prevent you from finding the best move in the position. At the same time, not looking deeply enough into your opponent’s moves will cause you to miss defensive opportunities against your opponent’s threats. (more…)

  • Tactics Tuesday #1

    White to move from Spielmann – Tartakower, 1925
    Alburt_135

    Highlight for answer: 1.Qh6! Qxe1+ 2.Bf1 (2.Kg2? Ne3+), and Black must give away his Queen with 2. …Qe#+

  • Secrets of Zen Chess

    Secrets of Zen Chess
    During my chess break, I ran into a friend of mine who loves chess and who had been in Japan doing a 4 week Seshin at a Japanese Zen Monestary.I asked him if he had time to practice his chess while at the monestary, and he told me that he had not, but that he had briefly spoken to a monk named Tezin, who also loved chess and was a pretty good player. He told me that Tezin had told him how his chess had improved in the last two years even though he did not practice as much as before he became a monk. Tezin told him that he attributed his chess improvement to what he called the ‘Secrets of Zen Chess’.
    I was very interested in hearing these so called secrets of chess improvement, and begged my friend to tell me what Tezin had relayed to him… so here goes:
    Less is More
    – Less focus on ratings and more focus on enjoyment & playing a beautiful game.
    – Less focus on reading books and more focus on practice.
    – Less focus on chess and more focus on solving the problems on the board.
    Impermanence
    – Because the position is always in flux, you need to adapt your plans and be flexible at all times.
    – Because of the fluidity of the position, the position needs to be reassessed every few moves.
    – Realize that dynamic advantages don’t last forever…take advantage of them while you have them.
    Practice
    – Practice for the sake of practice.
    – Practice for the beauty of the game.
    – Practice because you love to practice.
    Cause and effect
    – Consider the cause and effect of every move.
    – Consider how has the position changed after your opponent’s move
    – Consider how has the position changed after your move.
    – Consider if there are any tactical conditions on the board.
    Mindfulness
    – Be mindful of the game, you must become one with the board.
    – Be mindful of the harmony of your pieces.
    – Be mindful of the position, get to the marrow of board.
    – Be mindful of threats against you.
    – Be mindful of your threats against your opponent.
    – Be mindful of checks, captures and threats.
    Harmony
    – How can I improve the harmony of my pieces?
    – How can I disrupt the harmony of my opponent’s pieces?
    – How can I improve the weaknesses in my camp?
    – How can I create weaknesses in my opponent’s camp?
    Mastery lies in a convergence of skills that are already a part of you and not new knowledge derived from books. Mastery lies through practice that will lead you to uncover those things that are already inside you. Mastery lies in being mindful in life and at the board, so that you will know what your opponent’s plan is before your opponent realizes what his plan is. Mastery will be attained once you stop trying to attain mastery.
    These are the keys to mastery and these are the secrets of zen chess.

    During my most recent chess break, I ran into a friend of mine who loves chess and who had been in Japan doing a 4 week Seshin at a Japanese Zen Monestary.I asked him if he had time to practice his chess while at the monastery, and he told me that he had not, but that he had briefly spoken to a monk named Tezin, who also loved chess and was a pretty good player. He told me that Tezin had told him how his chess had improved in the last two years even though he did not practice as much as before he became a monk. Tezin told him that he attributed his chess improvement to what he called the ‘Secrets of Zen Chess’.

    I was very interested in hearing these so called secrets of chess improvement, and begged my friend to tell me what Tezin had relayed to him… so here goes:


    Less is More

    – Less focus on ratings and more focus on enjoyment & playing a beautiful game.

    – Less focus on reading books and more focus on practice.

    – Less focus on chess and more focus on solving the problems on the board.


    Impermanence

    – Because the position is always in flux, you need to adapt your plans and be flexible at all times.

    – Because of the fluidity of the position, the position needs to be reassessed every few moves.

    – Realize that dynamic advantages don’t last forever…take advantage of them while you have them.


    Practice

    – Practice for the sake of practice.

    – Practice for the beauty of the game.

    – Practice because you love to practice.


    Cause and effect

    – Consider the cause and effect of every move.

    – Consider how the position has changed after your opponent’s move

    – Consider how the position has changed after your move.

    – Consider if there are any tactical conditions on the board.


    Mindfulness

    – Be mindful of the game, you must become one with the board.

    – Be mindful of the harmony of your pieces.

    – Be mindful of the position, get to the marrow of the board.

    – Be mindful of threats against you.

    – Be mindful of your threats against your opponent.

    – Be mindful of checks, captures and threats.

    Harmony

    – How can I improve the harmony of my pieces?

    – How can I disrupt the harmony of my opponent’s pieces?

    – How can I improve the weaknesses in my camp?

    – How can I create weaknesses in my opponent’s camp?

    Mastery lies in a convergence of skills that are already a part of you and not new knowledge derived from books. Mastery lies through practice that will lead you to uncover those things that are already inside you. Mastery lies in being mindful in life and at the board, so that you will know what your opponent’s plan is before your opponent realizes what his plan is. Mastery will be attained once you stop trying to attain it.

    These are the keys to mastery and these are the secrets of Zen chess.

  • Evaluating Tactics

    I have started to evaluate tactical positions a bit differently than quiet strategic ones. For this purpose, I am using a tactical checklist, which is based on Heisman’s seeds of tactical destruction. I assessed the position in the using the checklist, and my evaluation is below. You can download a copy of the check list here.

    igc23_bWhite to move

     The King and black rook are on the same diagonal. The only piece preventing the Queen fork is the Bishop, so if the Bishop could be attacked, the fork would work. 1.Rf3 is the logical candidate. After 1.Rf3 the black rook could move to safety, where it would not be victim to the fork…but after further analysis the rook has no safe squares to go where he would be free from the fork. The next option for Black is to defend the bishop with the Queen, but again the Queen has no squares which are not attacked by either the White knight or the White d5 pawn. 1.Rf3  1…Qb7 2.Rxf6 Qb5 3.Qc3 Qf1+ 4.Kg3 Qg1+ 5.Kh4 1-0

  • Chess Taxonomy

    I am working on creating a Chessbase notebook (more on this in a much future post), and I am working out a way to effectively categorize my chess content. Below is a draft of the taxonomy I plan on using. For example pins would be categorized as Middlegame – Tactics – Pins, whereas King and pawn endgame content would be categorized as Endgame – Theory – K+P.

    Opening

    Principles
    e4- opening name
    d4 – opening name
    Tactics

    Middlegame

    Tactics – Pin
    Tactics – Backrank weakness
    Tactics – Decoy
    Tactics – Deflection
    Tactics – Double Attack
    Tactics – Exposed King
    Tactics – Fork
    Tactics – In-Between Move
    Tactics – Interference
    Tactics – Clearence
    Tactics – Mating Patterns
    Tactics – Overworked Piece
    Tactics – LPDO
    Tactics – Promotion
    Tactics – Skewer
    Strategy – BishopPair
    Strategy – Good vs. Bad Bishop
    Strategy – Bishop vs. Knight
    Strategy – Open Lines and Diagonals
    Strategy – Central Control
    Strategy – Closed Positions
    Strategy – Space
    Strategy – Activity
    Strategy – Isolated Pawns
    Strategy – Backward Pawns
    Strategy – Doubled Pawns
    Strategy – Pawn Chains
    Strategy – Passed Pawns
    Strategy – Minory Attack
    Strategy – Weak Color Complex
    Strategy – Weak Squares
    Strategy – Outposts
    Strategy – Positional Sacrifice
    Strategy – Harmony of the Pieces
    Strategy – Development

    Endgame

    Theory (Mueller / Fine type content)

    Theory – Lucena Position
    Theory – Philidor Position
    Theory – Shouldering
    Theory – Opposition
    Theory – Triangulation
    Theory – K+P
    Theory – R+P
    Theory – RvR
    Theory – Double Rook
    Theory – Queen
    Theory – Minor Piece  
    Theory – Fortresses
    Theory – BvN
    Theory – Bishops of Same Color
    Theory – Opposite Color Bishops

    Practice (Shereshevsky type content)
    Practice – King Centralization
    Practice –  Principle of Two Weaknesses
    Practice – Do Not Rush
    Practice – Passed Pawns
    Practice – Schematic Thinking
    Practice – Exchanges
    Practice – Fight for the Initative
    Practice – Prophalaxis
    Practice – Bishop Pair
    Practice – Zugzwang
    Practice – Fortresses
    Practice – Converting and Advantage

  • Training Notebook Week of 12.07.09

    Monday 12.07.09

    Played G/15 game and drew against opponent rated 1826 in a winning position (I was up a minor piece), but opponent had counterplay and I was down to 4 1/2 minutes on the clock.

    Tuesday 12.08.09

    Reviewed game. Confirmed that position was won. Opponent made a tactical mistake where he lost the exchange. Focused study will revolve against playing this position against Rybka 3.

    Wednesday 12.09.09

    Played won position against Rybka and lost twice!!! I should have simplified the position, since I was up 3 pawns.

    Thursday 12.10.09

    Played standard game on ICC against opponent rated 1710 (I am currently rated 1780 with one more provisional game to go). Lost game due to tactical oversights.

    Friday 12.11.09

    Reviewed standard game. I played poorly, going from a better position to even and ultimately to a losing position. My first mistake was an exchange that gave my opponent lots of activity and counterplay even though I had a material advantage. It is interesting to note, how high Rybka evaluates activity giving it an evaluation of over 1/2 a pawn. I then fell victim to a removal of the guard / pin / deflection combination which netted my opponent my bishop. I kept on playing, and ultimately fell victim to a checkmate, which I totally missed. Focused study will revolve around doing extra tactics.

    Saturday 12.12.09

     Focused on doing tactics at chess.com instead of chesstempo. Noticed that the timer is not helping my solving…dropped approximately 100 rating points!  I prefer solving the standard chesstempo tactics which allow me to take my time to find the right answer.

     Sunday

    Doing extra tactics solving at chess.com.

  • Chess Notebook Week of 11.30.09

    Monday 11.30.09

    Played G/20 20 game against opponent rated 1865. Played the Sicilian Grand Prix and lost in a rook endgame where I was a pawn down.

    Tuesday 12.01.09

    Reviewed game. Made an interesting observation that I would not have picked up on if I had not reviewed game. I lost 2 pawns during the game, because I failed to take back material. I chose to lose material instead of making an exchange that would benefit my opponent.  I have to remind myself during a game that material precedes any other strategic criteria.

    Solved tactics for 15 minutes.

    Wednesday 12.02.09

    Did Chess Tempo for 45 minutes. Was aiming for accuracy, so I only got to do 10 puzzles 65% success rate. I am currently rated 1702.

    Thursday 12.03.09

    Solved tactics for 15 minutes.

    Played G/20 20 game on ICC against opponent rated 1783, I won the game and I am now rated 1780 (still provisional).

    Friday 12.04.09

    Reviewed Thursday’s game. Opponent made several tactical oversights, I made several poor moves in the late middlegame, but my opponent did not take advantage of them. This leads to the importance of reviewing your games, even your wins. After the game, I felt pretty good about my play and I would have never guessed that I made two weak moves that would have converted a won game into a draw if my opponent had acted on them.

    Saturday 12.05.09

    Solved 1 hour of tactics

    Sunday 12.06.09

    Open day. Did 30 minutes of tactics on Chess Tempo. Reached my highest rating yet of 1714. Played a few blitz games on FICS.

  • Chess Notebook Week of 11.23.09

    Started new program mid week, so entries will be from Wednesday through Sunday.

    Wednesday 11.26.09

    Played G/15 5 game against an opponent rated 1687 on ICC (I am provisionally rated 1781 after this game). I plan on playing all of my standard games on ICC so that I can maintain continuity in tracking my ELO rating. ICC rating is approximately 250 points higher than USCF. At 1781 my rating is a bit inflated due to it’s provisional status…it should be more like 1600-1650 IMO.

    Solved tactics on Chess Tempo (30m)

    Thursday 11.27.09 [Thanksgiving]

    Reviewed Wednesday’s game – I won the game, but I came out poorly out of the opening. I have always had issues with the French Defense Exchange variation, so my focus study will be reviewing the French Exchange variation. (1 hour)

    Solved puzzles at Chess Tempo (15m)

    Friday 11.28.09

    Chess Tempo 30 minutes
    Focus Study: French Defense Exchange variation (1.30h)

    Saturday 11.29.09

    Solved (easy non-rated) puzzles on chesstempo (30m)
    Played G/15 5 game on ICC against opponent rated 1865 I am still provisionally rated with an ELO of  1768. NOTE: Next game will be a G/30 time control.

    Sunday 11.30.09
    Reviewed game. Loss stemmed from not calculating all possible candidates and faulty thought process, where I forgot threats I had assessed several moves before. Opponent came out of the opening slightly better. Opening played was the Caro-Kann Exchange variation. Going to focus on Stoyko Exercises to improve calculation skills as well as an intense tactics training session.

    Did one Stoyko exercise from a correspondence game I am currently playing. Analyzed the position for approximately 10 minutes. I also did a ‘Guess the Move’ game on chessgames.com. I chose a Capablanca game where Capa played White against the Caro-Kann defense. The chessgames.com exercise took about 30m.

    Tomorrow Monday I’ll restart the training schedule.

  • Simple Chess Training

    Making it Difficult

    After several years of working on my chess improvement and from talking to both amateurs and masters it appears that adult amateurs tend to complicate their chess improvement by reading books and tackling concepts that are far too advanced for their level.

    So, here is my attempt to simplify my chess training and bring it back to basics. This program is targeted for players under 1700 USCF.


    Study, Play, Review

    The study portion of the plan will consist of doing tactical puzzles at the Chess Tempo site every day for a minimum of 30 minutes. You will also spend a minimum of 1 hour studying  any areas dictated by reviews of our standard games which we will label focused study.

    Play will consist of a minimum of 2 standard games per week of either OTB play or on ICC / chess.com. The two take aways from this is that your rating will serve as a progress report, and that the games should be 15 minutes or longer (the longer the better). The content of these games will serve as the material for the focused study portion of the plan.

    Every standard game has to be reviewed afterwards. Go over the game without the use of an engine, and annotate what you were thinking. After having reviewed it on your own, have the engine analyze the game and then compare your notes with the engines analysis. Take this opportunity to review the opening phase, and what you could have done to improve that phase of the game by consulting opening books if necessary. Take note of mistakes made and in which phase of the game they were made. You will then focus your next study day on reviewing any content that will help prevent the mistakes made.

    Here’s an example of what a week would look like when following the plan:

    Monday

    Play G/15 or >
    Study tactics 30m

    Tuesday

    Review Monday’s game (annotate and identify weaknesses in play)
    Study tactics 30m

    Wednesday

    Focus Study 1h (Study is based on weaknesses from reviewed game, for example K&P endgame review if game lost in the endgame, or extra tactics study if game was lost due to a tactical oversight)

    Thursday
    Play G/15 or >
    Study tactics 30m

    Friday

    Review Monday’s game (annotate and identify weaknesses in play)
    Study tactics 30m

    Saturday

    Focus Study 1h (Study is based on weaknesses from reviewed game, for example K&P endgame review if game lost in the endgame, or extra tactics study if game was lost due to a tactical oversight)

    Sunday

    Rest day or you can use this day to catch up on your studying, do extra tactics or play blitz games, etc.

  • Chess Resolutions

    Farbror the Guru has challenged the chess improvement community to come up with a list of chess goals for the coming year, so here are mine:

    Long Term Goals

    • Increase USCF rating to 1400 (currently at 1283)
    • Increase Chess Tempo standard tactics rating to 1850 (currently at 1700)
    • Increase ICC standard rating (currently have a provisional rating of 1750) will set appropriate ELO goals within the next 3 months once I get out of provisional status. update 01.03.10 Out of provisional rating after having played 26 standard games. Benchmark rating is 1781 goal is to reach an ICC rating of 1825 by the end of the year.
    • Play in 4 tournaments within the next 12 months
    • Play a minimum of 2 standard games G/15 or > per week
    • Have a minimum of 6 training sessions in the next 12 months with FM Charles Galofre

    Short Term Goals (goals for the next 90 days)

    • Dedicate 1 hour per day to chess training
    • Review all of my standard games
    • Play in an OTB tournament before the end of February ’10
    • Have a chess lesson before the end of February ’10
    • Simplify my chess training, focus more on the practical side of chess
    • Increase Chess Tempo rating to 1750 by the end of February ’10